Lindsay Clancy defense demands investigation into holdout juror who blocked not guilty verdict

Lindsay Clancy’s legal team is calling for an investigation into the holdout juror who wanted to find her guilty of murder charges in connection with the strangling deaths of her three young children.

Clancy attorney Kevin Reddington is asking a Massachusetts judge to preserve juror records from all 12 panelists and six alternates, including their questionnaires, courthouse hallway surveillance video taken outside the deliberation room and sign-in sheets for the jurors’ cellphones.

Reddington is asking the court to conduct a “limited inquiry” into the holdout and for information on any potential background checks stemming from a February motion for access to prospective juror information filed by Plymouth County prosecutors.

LINDSAY CLANCY HOLDOUT JUROR MAKES NEW PROMISE AS LAWYER WARNS OF PUBLIC ATTACKS

He’s also seeking the holdout’s juror questionnaire and any supplemental filings, probation records and “Juror Doe’s record from the statewide domestic violence registry.” He is asking the judge to require prosecutors to divulge whether it has had any contact with the holdout as a defendant, complainant or subject going back to January 2021.

Additionally, Reddington is looking for the holdout’s phone records between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on each deliberation day and asking for the court to order an independent examination into his phone use during the deliberation period.

Read the motion:

Lastly, he wants the holdout to be grilled regarding the truthfulness of his juror questionnaire and voir dire answers, his statements to the court on Sept. 3, and the use of a phone or outside information during deliberations.

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

SIGN UP TO GET THE LATEST TRUE CRIME NEWS

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE

“The court may also hear from Juror No. 10 limited to what he observed of Juror Doe’s phone use,” Reddington advised in the filing.

LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR ADMITTED ‘REASONABLE DOUBT’ BUT STILL REFUSED INSANITY VERDICT, FOREPERSON SAYS

GOT A TIP?

Clancy’s trial was declared a mistrial on Sept. 4 after jurors deadlocked 11-1 in favor of finding her not criminally responsible for the slayings due to mental illness or defect. Her defense had claimed she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and repeatedly sought help to no avail.

LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST

Prosecutors argued that she acted deliberately and understood that strangling her children one by one with exercise bands was wrong.

LINDSAY CLANCY DA RARELY DOES PLEA DEALS, BUT HER CASE COULD BE THE ‘EXCEPTION,’ VETERAN ATTORNEY SAYS

GET BREAKING NEWS BY EMAIL

The lone holdout juror is referred to only as “Juror Doe” in the motion due to the court’s impoundment order protecting the jurors’ identities.

Prosecutors have not yet officially announced whether they’ll seek a new trial for Clancy, who faces three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months.

Clancy’s attorney has separately asked the court to overrule the holdout and declare her not guilty, a routine motion that experts nonetheless have said rarely succeeds.